corrections
April 10, 2007 · 1 Comment
Categories: Journalism · Media · Photography
-
Contact
rollfilm [at] gmail [dot] com -
RF Universe
-
Visitor Locations
Tagcloud
Blogs
- (Notes on) Politics, Theory & Photography
- 2point8
- 40 watt
- a day with clay
- And then came the shot
- B
- Bryan Formhals
- Chase Jarvis Blog
- Conscientious
- Exposure Compensation
- Flak Photo
- Gallery Hopper
- Ground Glass
- Heading East
- hiding in plain sight
- Hipshots
- i heart photograph
- iN-PUBLiC | The home of street photography
- Le Musee de la Photo
- lens culture photography weblog
- Magnum Blog - the photo blog of Magnum Photos
- muse-ings
- Neunplus News
- NO CAPTION NEEDED
- No Caption Needed
- NOTIFBUTWHEN #2
- paul russell: street photography
- Personism
- photographs on the brain
- photographylot
- photokaboom.com Blog
- selected photographs
- Shenphoto Blog & News
- Snappertalk | Ben Curtis
- Snapshot.fi
- stpiduko
- The Daily Flog
- The Exposure Project
- The Sonic Blog
- The Spark of Accident
- The Year in Pictures
- urban views. New York photographs by Markus Hartel
Archives
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (5)
- January 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (2)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (3)
- April 2007 (6)
- March 2007 (11)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (1)
- December 2006 (2)
- November 2006 (6)
- September 2006 (12)
- August 2006 (6)
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Cutline by Chris Pearson.
1 response so far ↓
Todd W. // April 22, 2007 at 3:46 pm
While it does appear that the Blade has made a slight manipulation (needlessly), it also appears that you’re comparing two different photographs across the four papers. It looks to me that the Blade and the Dayton Daily News used one photo and the Plain Dealer and Lima News used a different photo taken from a slightly different angle (perhaps only one or two steps away.)
Leave a Comment